smarter
smart cities
smarter
smart cities
smarter
smart cities
Traditional CRM's exist to serve a flat internet. 2D information served through flat devices is Web 2.0, and is now the 'old' way to engage content and customers. A first set of tools enable translating 2D content into 3D Meta Content. Further tools create a toolkit dashboard to go way beyond in interface and interaction.
Traditional CRM's exist to serve a flat internet. 2D information served through flat devices is Web 2.0, and is now the 'old' way to engage content and customers. A first set of tools enable translating 2D content into 3D Meta Content. Further tools create a toolkit dashboard to go way beyond in interface and interaction.
Traditional CRM's exist to serve a flat internet. 2D information served through flat devices is Web 2.0, and is now the 'old' way to engage content and customers. A first set of tools enable translating 2D content into 3D Meta Content. Further tools create a toolkit dashboard to go way beyond in interface and interaction.
Thinking about Daily Life as 3D experiences.
I'm currently focused on showing a fully responsive experiential spatial internet, that uses AI to learn to personal prediction and prescription models.
I help make fully immersive digital experiences disappear so the pure human expression and relationships can emerge.
Thinking about Daily Life as 3D experiences.
I'm currently focused on showing a fully responsive experiential spatial internet, that uses AI to learn to personal prediction and prescription models.
I help make fully immersive digital experiences disappear so the pure human expression and relationships can emerge.
Ambient Smart Cities are the future of our shared urban areas.
In an ambient intelligence world, devices work in concert to support people in carrying out their everyday life activities, tasks and rituals in an easy, natural way using information and intelligence that is hidden in the network connecting these devices. As these devices grow smaller, more connected and more integrated into our environment, the technology disappears into our surroundings until only the user interface remains perceivable by users.
Ambient Smart Cities are the future of our shared urban areas.
In an ambient intelligence world, devices work in concert to support people in carrying out their everyday life activities, tasks and rituals in an easy, natural way using information and intelligence that is hidden in the network connecting these devices. As these devices grow smaller, more connected and more integrated into our environment, the technology disappears into our surroundings until only the user interface remains perceivable by users.
Ambient Smart Cities are the future of our shared urban areas.
In an ambient intelligence world, devices work in concert to support people in carrying out their everyday life activities, tasks and rituals in an easy, natural way using information and intelligence that is hidden in the network connecting these devices. As these devices grow smaller, more connected and more integrated into our environment, the technology disappears into our surroundings until only the user interface remains perceivable by users.
Award Winning, Designer and Technologist.
Award Winning, Designer and Technologist.
Award Winning, Designer and Technologist.
A wealth of product and project management experience applied to work, gained through leading teams deploying groundbreaking technologies and services.
A wealth of product and project management experience applied to work, gained through leading teams deploying groundbreaking technologies and services.
A wealth of product and project management experience applied to work, gained through leading teams deploying groundbreaking technologies and services.
GET IN TOUCH!
GET IN TOUCH!
GET IN TOUCH!
As a technologist, Adrian magically integrate the virtual and physical worlds. engage with spatial objects and user interfaces, virtual avatars, intelligent robots, location-aware smart devices, virtual transactions and universe-scale teleportation abilities. A unified reality that seamlessly combines the virtual and the physical.
As a technologist, Adrian magically integrate the virtual and physical worlds. engage with spatial objects and user interfaces, virtual avatars, intelligent robots, location-aware smart devices, virtual transactions and universe-scale teleportation abilities. A unified reality that seamlessly combines the virtual and the physical.
As a technologist, Adrian magically integrate the virtual and physical worlds. engage with spatial objects and user interfaces, virtual avatars, intelligent robots, location-aware smart devices, virtual transactions and universe-scale teleportation abilities. A unified reality that seamlessly combines the virtual and the physical.
$95
Suggested
tracking
$95
Suggested
tracking
Content & Commerce for You.
Content & Commerce for You.
$95
Suggested
tracking
Content & Commerce for You.
Location, location, location; it’s the real-estators mantra. Location is what matters most for something like a house, but what does location actually imply?
It’s not the coordinates that matter, or the address (unless you live on Awesome Street).
No. What matters is what is near you.
Close to a supermarket, a train station, a school or your job. Or, depending on your preferences, as far removed from those things as possible.
The true worth of location is not the absolute location, but the relative location to other things. In effect, the value of location is the value of network, of all things combined, of the ecosystem with which you surround yourself. Coordinates and addresses are, in fact, meaningless.
People don’t really relate to to coordinates or addresses anyway.
When I tell a fellow Rotterdammer that I live on *insert address*, all I get is a blank stare, but when I proceed to say it’s at the foot of the Erasmus bridge, between the theater and the KPN building, they know exactly where I live. Again, my location is defined by its surroundings.
Location isn’t any different for your things. What do you want to know when you’re looking for something? Coordinates are pretty useless (yes i’m looking at you ‘find my iPhone’), and even a relative “they’re 15m to your left” can be pretty confusing. What you want to hear is what your mother/roommate/significant other would tell you: “Your keys are on the kitchen table, dumbass!”
Again; location is not defined by a numbered spot on Earth, but by surroundings. That’s how people work, that’s how we speak, that is how we interpret the world. Why should our systems speak a different language?
Location, location, location; it’s the real-estators mantra. Location is what matters most for something like a house, but what does location actually imply?
It’s not the coordinates that matter, or the address (unless you live on Awesome Street).
No. What matters is what is near you.
Close to a supermarket, a train station, a school or your job. Or, depending on your preferences, as far removed from those things as possible.
The true worth of location is not the absolute location, but the relative location to other things. In effect, the value of location is the value of network, of all things combined, of the ecosystem with which you surround yourself. Coordinates and addresses are, in fact, meaningless.
People don’t really relate to to coordinates or addresses anyway.
When I tell a fellow Rotterdammer that I live on *insert address*, all I get is a blank stare, but when I proceed to say it’s at the foot of the Erasmus bridge, between the theater and the KPN building, they know exactly where I live. Again, my location is defined by its surroundings.
Location isn’t any different for your things. What do you want to know when you’re looking for something? Coordinates are pretty useless (yes i’m looking at you ‘find my iPhone’), and even a relative “they’re 15m to your left” can be pretty confusing. What you want to hear is what your mother/roommate/significant other would tell you: “Your keys are on the kitchen table, dumbass!”
Again; location is not defined by a numbered spot on Earth, but by surroundings. That’s how people work, that’s how we speak, that is how we interpret the world. Why should our systems speak a different language?
Location, location, location; it’s the real-estators mantra. Location is what matters most for something like a house, but what does location actually imply?
It’s not the coordinates that matter, or the address (unless you live on Awesome Street).
No. What matters is what is near you.
Close to a supermarket, a train station, a school or your job. Or, depending on your preferences, as far removed from those things as possible.
The true worth of location is not the absolute location, but the relative location to other things. In effect, the value of location is the value of network, of all things combined, of the ecosystem with which you surround yourself. Coordinates and addresses are, in fact, meaningless.
People don’t really relate to to coordinates or addresses anyway.
When I tell a fellow Rotterdammer that I live on *insert address*, all I get is a blank stare, but when I proceed to say it’s at the foot of the Erasmus bridge, between the theater and the KPN building, they know exactly where I live. Again, my location is defined by its surroundings.
Location isn’t any different for your things. What do you want to know when you’re looking for something? Coordinates are pretty useless (yes i’m looking at you ‘find my iPhone’), and even a relative “they’re 15m to your left” can be pretty confusing. What you want to hear is what your mother/roommate/significant other would tell you: “Your keys are on the kitchen table, dumbass!”
Again; location is not defined by a numbered spot on Earth, but by surroundings. That’s how people work, that’s how we speak, that is how we interpret the world. Why should our systems speak a different language?
data has always lead our innovation efforts. We started with a new way to describe the physical world, and went from there. Our current interest includes solving context, and encoding it. Crossing many platform, standards, technologies and methods, we combine the best approach to address the end goal: intelligence in your environment.
data has always lead our innovation efforts. We started with a new way to describe the physical world, and went from there. Our current interest includes solving context, and encoding it. Crossing many platform, standards, technologies and methods, we combine the best approach to address the end goal: intelligence in your environment.
data has always lead our innovation efforts. We started with a new way to describe the physical world, and went from there. Our current interest includes solving context, and encoding it. Crossing many platform, standards, technologies and methods, we combine the best approach to address the end goal: intelligence in your environment.
For as long as it exists, the internet has been about 'getting information' more than supplying it. This, of course, is not true, as no information can be gotten with someone supplying it first. Our emotions, however, see it as a place to 'get', a place where things can be gotten for 'free'. Am I putting a picture on Facebook to share the picture?
Maybe, but I sure want those 'free' likes to stroke my ego. That's the information I'm looking for.
Inadvertently, I'm supplying a lot of information about myself that I didn't set out to share in the first place. Do I care about that information? Not really, but I did not log in to Facebook with the sheer purpose of giving Zuckerberg my vital statistics to build a billion dollar business on. Can you imagine that marketing campaign? "Give us your personal information, and we'll give you more and better adds!"
And this is where the paradigm is shifting. By moving the internet to our things, we are consciously and actively seeking ways to provide information about us (our things) to parties who help us act on that information. Why aren't we apprehensive about this? Because we understand how this information enables services which directly enhance the value of said 'thing', whereas we don't see a straight-line benefit in telling Zuckerberg about our sexual preferences.
For as long as it exists, the internet has been about 'getting information' more than supplying it. This, of course, is not true, as no information can be gotten with someone supplying it first. Our emotions, however, see it as a place to 'get', a place where things can be gotten for 'free'. Am I putting a picture on Facebook to share the picture?
Maybe, but I sure want those 'free' likes to stroke my ego. That's the information I'm looking for.
Inadvertently, I'm supplying a lot of information about myself that I didn't set out to share in the first place. Do I care about that information? Not really, but I did not log in to Facebook with the sheer purpose of giving Zuckerberg my vital statistics to build a billion dollar business on. Can you imagine that marketing campaign? "Give us your personal information, and we'll give you more and better adds!"
And this is where the paradigm is shifting. By moving the internet to our things, we are consciously and actively seeking ways to provide information about us (our things) to parties who help us act on that information. Why aren't we apprehensive about this? Because we understand how this information enables services which directly enhance the value of said 'thing', whereas we don't see a straight-line benefit in telling Zuckerberg about our sexual preferences.
For as long as it exists, the internet has been about 'getting information' more than supplying it. This, of course, is not true, as no information can be gotten with someone supplying it first. Our emotions, however, see it as a place to 'get', a place where things can be gotten for 'free'. Am I putting a picture on Facebook to share the picture?
Maybe, but I sure want those 'free' likes to stroke my ego. That's the information I'm looking for.
Inadvertently, I'm supplying a lot of information about myself that I didn't set out to share in the first place. Do I care about that information? Not really, but I did not log in to Facebook with the sheer purpose of giving Zuckerberg my vital statistics to build a billion dollar business on. Can you imagine that marketing campaign? "Give us your personal information, and we'll give you more and better adds!"
And this is where the paradigm is shifting. By moving the internet to our things, we are consciously and actively seeking ways to provide information about us (our things) to parties who help us act on that information. Why aren't we apprehensive about this? Because we understand how this information enables services which directly enhance the value of said 'thing', whereas we don't see a straight-line benefit in telling Zuckerberg about our sexual preferences.